EU-UK Real Estate Reset: A Critical Path Forward for Fund Managers
The relationship between the European Union and the United Kingdom has entered a new phase, and nowhere is the need for practical cooperation more evident than in the real estate investment sector. As both sides work toward resetting their post-Brexit relationship, fund managers operating across these markets are watching closely for concrete measures that could restore the seamless cross-border operations they once enjoyed. The stakes are high, with billions in assets under management and countless investment opportunities hanging in the balance.
Real estate fund managers have faced unprecedented challenges since the UK’s departure from the EU, navigating a complex web of regulatory divergence, market access restrictions, and operational inefficiencies. The current discussions around an EU-UK reset present a genuine opportunity to address these pain points and create a framework that benefits investors, managers, and the broader real estate ecosystem on both sides of the Channel.
The Case for an EU-UK Real Estate Partnership
The real estate fund management industry has historically thrived on cross-border investment flows between the UK and EU markets. London’s position as a global financial center combined with the diverse property markets across European cities created a natural synergy that benefited institutional investors worldwide. AREF (Association of Real Estate Funds) and other industry bodies have consistently highlighted how this interconnectedness drove innovation, liquidity, and growth across the sector.
Since Brexit, however, the landscape has fundamentally shifted. UK-based fund managers have lost their automatic passporting rights, which previously allowed them to market and manage funds across EU member states without establishing separate entities in each jurisdiction. This has forced many firms to establish costly dual structures, splitting operations between London and European financial centers like Dublin, Luxembourg, or Frankfurt. The fragmentation has not only increased operational costs but has also created inefficiencies in capital allocation and reduced the competitiveness of both UK and EU fund managers in the global marketplace.
Breaking Down Post-Brexit Market Barriers
The current barriers facing real estate fund managers extend far beyond simple regulatory compliance. Market access restrictions have created a two-tier system where managers must navigate different rules for different investor bases, leading to increased legal costs, administrative burden, and strategic complexity. UK managers seeking to raise capital from EU institutional investors now face significant hurdles, while EU-based managers looking to invest in UK real estate encounter similar obstacles from the opposite direction.
One of the most pressing issues involves the delegation of portfolio management and the ability to service existing fund structures. Many UK asset managers previously delegated certain functions to EU-based teams or vice versa, creating efficient operational models that leveraged expertise across borders. Post-Brexit restrictions on delegation have forced uncomfortable choices, with some managers having to duplicate teams or relocate key personnel. According to Financial Times reporting on the investment management sector, these structural changes have cost the industry hundreds of millions in relocation expenses and ongoing operational duplication. The regulatory uncertainty has also deterred some international investors from committing capital to funds that straddle both markets, preferring instead to invest in structures based entirely within either the EU or UK.
What Fund Managers Need from the Reset Deal
Real estate fund managers have articulated clear priorities for what a meaningful EU-UK reset must deliver. First and foremost, they need a practical framework for cross-border fund marketing and distribution. This doesn’t necessarily require full restoration of passporting rights, but rather a streamlined mutual recognition system that reduces bureaucratic friction while maintaining appropriate investor protections. Such a system would allow UK and EU fund managers to access each other’s markets without maintaining expensive duplicate structures.
Secondly, managers need clarity on delegation arrangements and the ability to organize their operations efficiently across both jurisdictions. This includes:
- Clear rules on portfolio management delegation between UK and EU entities
- Reasonable requirements for substance and oversight in each jurisdiction
- Proportionate regulatory supervision that avoids duplication
- Mutual recognition of professional qualifications and certifications
Beyond these operational concerns, fund managers are calling for regulatory cooperation on emerging issues such as sustainability reporting, ESG standards, and climate risk disclosure. The EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) has set new standards that UK managers must navigate when marketing to EU investors, while the UK is developing its own sustainability disclosure framework. Alignment or at least interoperability between these systems would significantly reduce compliance burdens and ensure that capital can flow efficiently toward sustainable real estate investments on both sides.
Building a Framework for Cross-Border Growth
A successful EU-UK reset in real estate fund management requires a framework built on pragmatism and mutual benefit rather than political posturing. The foundation should be equivalence-based cooperation, where both sides recognize that their regulatory systems, while different in detail, achieve similar outcomes in terms of investor protection and market integrity. This approach has precedent in how the EU engages with other major financial centers globally, including Switzerland and the United States.
The framework must also address practical operational matters that directly impact fund performance and investor returns. For instance, clarity on tax treatment of cross-border real estate investments, withholding tax rates, and the ability to efficiently repatriate capital and income would remove significant friction from investment decision-making. Many institutional investors, particularly pension funds and insurance companies, operate under strict mandates regarding tax efficiency and cannot accept unnecessary tax leakage due to regulatory gaps between the UK and EU. A comprehensive reset deal would include provisions ensuring that technical tax issues don’t inadvertently create barriers to legitimate investment activity.
Looking forward, the framework should be designed with flexibility to evolve as both markets develop. The real estate sector is undergoing rapid transformation driven by technology, changing work patterns, sustainability imperatives, and demographic shifts. Fund managers need regulatory structures that can accommodate innovation in areas such as:
- Tokenization and digital assets in real estate investment
- New fund structures for emerging property sectors like life sciences and data centers
- Co-investment platforms that connect institutional capital with development opportunities
- Alternative debt structures for real estate financing
By creating a forward-looking framework rather than simply attempting to recreate pre-Brexit arrangements, the UK and EU can position their real estate fund management industries for long-term success in an increasingly competitive global market.
In Short
The EU-UK reset negotiations present a critical opportunity to address the challenges facing real estate fund managers since Brexit. The current fragmentation of the market benefits no one, imposing costs on managers, reducing returns for investors, and diminishing the competitiveness of both UK and EU fund management industries globally. A pragmatic approach focused on equivalence, mutual recognition, and operational efficiency could restore much of the cross-border functionality that made European real estate fund management so successful.
The path forward requires political will from both sides to prioritize economic substance over symbolic victories. Real estate fund managers aren’t asking for special treatment, but rather for sensible arrangements that acknowledge the integrated nature of property investment and the global competition for institutional capital. With London remaining a leading financial center and European cities offering diverse investment opportunities, a well-functioning UK-EU real estate investment market serves the interests of investors, pensioners, and economies on both sides of the Channel. The reset discussions must deliver concrete progress on market access, delegation, and regulatory cooperation to ensure that this potential is realized rather than squandered through continued fragmentation.
FAQ
What are passporting rights in real estate fund management?
Passporting rights allowed UK-based fund managers to market and manage investment funds across all EU member states without establishing separate legal entities in each country. These rights were automatically available to UK firms as EU members but were lost following Brexit, requiring managers to establish EU-based entities to continue servicing European clients.
How has Brexit affected cross-border real estate investment between the UK and EU?
Brexit has created regulatory barriers that increase costs and complexity for fund managers operating across UK and EU markets. These include loss of automatic market access, restrictions on delegation of portfolio management, duplication of operational infrastructure, and regulatory uncertainty that has deterred some international investors from committing capital to cross-border structures.
What is regulatory equivalence in financial services?
Regulatory equivalence is a framework where two jurisdictions recognize that their regulatory systems, while potentially different in specifics, achieve comparable outcomes in terms of investor protection, market integrity, and financial stability. This recognition can allow for streamlined market access and reduced regulatory duplication between the jurisdictions.
Why is the EU-UK reset important for institutional investors?
Institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies benefit from efficient access to diverse real estate opportunities across both UK and EU markets. The current fragmented regulatory environment increases costs, reduces investment flexibility, and creates tax inefficiencies that ultimately reduce returns for beneficiaries. A successful reset would restore more efficient capital allocation across these markets.
What role does sustainability regulation play in the EU-UK real estate reset?
Sustainability disclosure requirements are increasingly important for real estate investment, with the EU implementing comprehensive rules through SFDR and the UK developing its own framework. Alignment or interoperability between these systems would reduce compliance burdens for fund managers and ensure capital can flow efficiently toward sustainable real estate investments without unnecessary regulatory friction.
Join The Discussion